Greetings, skin microbiome enthusiasts π
Let me ask you a question:
How do you feel when a product says itβs made with a βproprietary blendβ or a βproprietary technologyβ β and then stops there?
Would you still feel confident buying it?
Or wonder⦠what exactly am I putting on my skin?
Transparency vs. Marketing Hype
That word β proprietary β really bothers me.
If we canβt tell customers exactly what weβre giving them in exchange for their money, where does the responsibility lie?
Is it the companyβs fault for not being transparent β or the consumerβs for not asking enough questions?
Iβve always believed my role is to educate, especially when it comes to the growing βprobiotic skincareβ trend. I want people to know what really matters β and how to spot the difference between true innovation and clever marketing.
But sometimes I wonder⦠is education enough?
Or should I call out the brands that hide behind vague claims?
For years, Iβve avoided comparing myself to competitors. My focus has always been on my customers, not βthe industry.β
But every now and then, something makes me want to speak up.
An Example That Hit a Nerve
Recently, I came across a well-known skincare brand. (Name not important β but trust me, theyβre popular among aestheticians.)
Their brand identity revolves around probiotics.
Yet, out of their entire line, only one product even mentions βlive cells.β
They describe their formula as a βproprietary blendβ with βpatented encapsulation technologyβ that keeps probiotics alive for two years at room temperature β in a liquid form.
Sounds impressive, right?
Until you look closer.
1οΈβ£ Their ingredient list contains no water β but they call it aqueous. By definition, βaqueousβ means water-based. Oil β aqueous.
2οΈβ£ The formula is actually oil-based, meaning non-aqueous.
3οΈβ£ They claim the probiotics are βencapsulated and released upon contact with skin.β
4οΈβ£ And this one is my favorite: βproprietary blend of probiotics.β That phrase does not mean anything.
Most likely, theyβre using the same blend many others are β purchased from the same contract manufacturer (CMO) that supplies dozens of brands.
If their blend were truly special, wouldnβt they at least mention the genus of the probiotics used?
And whereβs the viability data to prove those cells are alive?
If this technology really worked, the entire biotech and cosmetic world would be racing to license it.
I Asked for Data (and Crickets)
I did something I almost never do β I asked them directly.
Multiple times.
Through their website.
Through social media.
No response.
If your technology is truly that good β and already patented β why not show the data?
Why not educate others and strengthen trust?
Transparency doesnβt threaten innovation β it strengthens it.
So Hereβs My Question for You
When it comes to skincare (or any product),
do you support vague claims that sound fancy,
or clear and transparent communication that respects your intelligence?
Because for me, skincare β especially alive skincare β should be about honesty, science, and trust.
Not hiding behind the word βproprietary.β
If youβre looking for probiotic skincare that clearly tells you what strain youβre putting on your skin β and actually shows viability data, both in the package and after activation β and is truly water-based,
I honestly donβt think youβll find any other brand like Fafabiotic. π
Until next blog, cheers





Fresh Hydrating + Fresh Smoothing
Choose Fresh Smoothing OR