Your skin is covered in living organisms right now. Far from being a problem, most of them are the reason your skin works at all. Here is what they are, where they live, and what the research actually shows.
The short answer
The skin microbiome is the community of bacteria, fungi and viruses living on your skin, together with the environment they occupy. Most are harmless or actively helpful. They vary enormously depending on which part of your body you look at, and they are in constant conversation with your immune system.
Skin is the largest organ of the human body, and it has never been sterile. It is colonised by a diverse community of microorganisms, most of which are harmless or even beneficial to their host.2
That word, microbiome, gets used loosely in skincare marketing. It is worth being precise about it, because the precision is where the useful information lives.
Your skin is not one habitat. It is at least three.
This is the single most useful thing to understand, and it is the thing most skincare advice ignores.
Microbial composition is dictated by topography. Skin has biogeographically distinct regions, usually sorted into three types based on their physical characteristics: sebaceous, moist and dry. Each is shaped by its own pH, temperature, sebum content and moisture level, and each supports a different community.4
💧
Sebaceous
Forehead, chest, back, behind the ears
Oily and low oxygen. Dominated by Cutibacterium. Counterintuitively, this is the least diverse of the three.
🌪
Moist
Inner elbow, underarm, groin
Warm and humid. Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus in roughly equal measure.
🍃
Dry
Forearm, palm
Exposed and variable. Holds the greatest diversity of any skin region.
In plain terms
Think of your skin as a landscape rather than a surface. A rainforest and a desert are both Earth, but you would not expect the same wildlife in each. Your forehead and your forearm are that different from one another.
This is why sweeping claims about "restoring your microbiome" should make you pause. There is no single microbiome to restore, and a product cannot meaningfully target all three environments in the same way.
So who actually lives up there?
At the broadest level, four bacterial groups account for the overwhelming majority of what is found on healthy human skin.4
Major bacterial phyla on healthy skin
Actinobacteria 36–51%
Firmicutes 24–34%
Proteobacteria 11–16%
Bacteroidetes 6–9%
Ranges reported across healthy adults. Individual variation is substantial.
They are not just sitting there
This is the part I find most interesting, and the part that changed how I think about formulation. Reviews of the field describe not just which species are present in health and disease, but the dynamics between them and their interactions with the immune system.1
Take Staphylococcus epidermidis, one of the most common residents of human skin. It is not a passive passenger. It actively primes the cutaneous immune response, helps maintain skin homeostasis, and prevents opportunistic pathogens from establishing themselves through a mechanism called colonisation resistance.3
The useful question is rarely whether bacteria on your skin are good or bad. It is which organisms, in what context, doing what.
The same species can be helpful or harmful
Here is where it gets genuinely complicated, and where a lot of marketing quietly oversimplifies.
That same S. epidermidis exists on a spectrum of potential pathogenicity, driven by high strain-level variation. It is also the most common cause of implant-associated infections.3 Same species name. Very different behaviour depending on the strain and the circumstances.
✗ The myth
"It contains a good bacteria, so it is good for your skin."
✓ What the science says
Behaviour is determined at the strain level, not the species level. A species name alone tells you very little.
This is exactly why strain identification matters so much in this field, and why I will be giving it a whole article of its own.
What we still do not know
Most skincare content skips this section. I would rather not.
The field has moved fast, but a great deal remains genuinely unsettled. We do not have a clean definition of what a healthy microbiome looks like for any given individual. We do not fully understand how durably a topical product can shift these communities, or for how long after you stop using it.
Where evidence is strong, I will tell you. Where it is preliminary, I will tell you that too. That is the whole point of this series.
Key takeaways
✓ Your skin hosts a diverse microbial community, and most of it is harmless or beneficial.
✓ There is no single skin microbiome. Sebaceous, moist and dry sites host different communities.
✓ Dry skin sites are the most diverse. Oily sites are the least.
✓ These organisms interact with your immune system rather than sitting inertly on the surface.
✓ Strain matters more than species. Be cautious of any claim resting on a species name alone.
References
Links go to the peer-reviewed record, not to a summary of it. You are welcome to check my work.
1. Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(3):143–155. PubMed 29332945
2. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(4):244–253. PubMed 21407241
3. Severn MM, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus epidermidis and its dual lifestyle in skin health and infection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(2):97–111. PubMed 36042296
4. Spatial diversity of the skin bacteriome. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMC10546022
Still have a question?
Submit it here, and it may become the next Ask the Scientist article.
Ask your questionAbout the author
Dr. Farzaneh Rezaei, PhD Microbiology
Founder of Fafabiotic, with 2 decades developing microbial technologies. She writes Ask the Scientist to explain the science behind probiotic skincare without the marketing layer.
More about meEducational content only. This article is not medical advice and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Last reviewed 2 August 2026.